State ex rel. Schrunk v. Holm

685 P.2d 477, 69 Or. App. 335, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3935
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 1, 1984
DocketA 8208-04785; CA A30249
StatusPublished

This text of 685 P.2d 477 (State ex rel. Schrunk v. Holm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Schrunk v. Holm, 685 P.2d 477, 69 Or. App. 335, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3935 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an action to abate, as a nuisance, the use by defendant Wong of certain locations in Multnomah County as places of prostitution. The trial court abated the nuisance and enjoined defendant “from maintaining and conducting as a place for lewdness, assignation and prostitution, the premises [in question] or [premises] anywhere else within Multnomah County, Oregon.” (Emphasis supplied.) On this appeal, defendant maintains that inclusion by the court of the underlined phrase exceeds the court’s authority under the pertinent statutes, ORS 465.110 and 465.120. We agree. The emphasized portion of the trial court’s injunction is deleted. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 465.110
Oregon § 465.110

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
685 P.2d 477, 69 Or. App. 335, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schrunk-v-holm-orctapp-1984.