State ex rel. Schramm v. District Court of Eighteenth Judicial District

493 P.2d 343, 158 Mont. 550, 1972 Mont. LEXIS 502
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 8, 1972
DocketNo. 12210
StatusPublished

This text of 493 P.2d 343 (State ex rel. Schramm v. District Court of Eighteenth Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Schramm v. District Court of Eighteenth Judicial District, 493 P.2d 343, 158 Mont. 550, 1972 Mont. LEXIS 502 (Mo. 1972).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This is an original proceeding wherein relator petitioned for a writ of supervisory control directed to the respondent court to require that an order denying relator’s motion to suppress evidence and for production of evidence in a cause [551]*551pending in the district court of Gallatin County entitled “The State of Montana, Plaintiff v. Charles William Schramm, Defendant”, be vacated and reversed.

Following ex parte presentation by counsel an order was issued staying proceedings and requiring that the records be certified to this Court for review and fixing a date for oral argument thereon. The respondent court made written return and counsel for the parties appeared in oral argument on the return day.

Upon the hearing counsel for the respondent court confessed error in the district court proceedings and moved that the district court’s order herein complained of be vacated and set aside and that the cause be remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

The Court having considered the arguments presented, the court files, transcript of the evidence, and the applicable law, it is ordered that the motion of the respondent court be denied.

Let the writ of supervisory control issue, commanding the respondent court to vacate and set aside its order of December 9, 1971, denying the motion to suppress and for the production of evidence, and to make and enter an order granting the motion.

Upon the entry of such order the motion of relator’s counsel, made orally at the district court hearing, that the information be quashed should be granted and the cause ordered dismissed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 P.2d 343, 158 Mont. 550, 1972 Mont. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schramm-v-district-court-of-eighteenth-judicial-district-mont-1972.