State ex rel. Schottenstein v. Belskis
614 N.E.2d 760, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1513, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1622
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for issuance of an alternative writ,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for issuance of an alternative writ be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective June 21, 1993.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Schottenstein v. Belskis, 614 N.E.2d 760, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1513, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1622 (Ohio 1993).
614 N.E.2d 760 (State ex rel. Schottenstein v. Belskis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeLong
786 N.E.2d 1280 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson
2001 Ohio 1300 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson
753 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)