State ex rel. School District of Plattsburg v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. School District of Plattsburg v. Bowman

77 S.W. 1135, 178 Mo. 663, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 381

DecidedDecember 23, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.W. 1135 (State ex rel. School District of Plattsburg v. Bowman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. School District of Plattsburg v. Bowman, 77 S.W. 1135, 178 Mo. 663, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 381 (Mo. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

MARSHALL, J.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the defendant, as assessor of taxes for Clinton county, to correct the assessments involved in the case of School District of Plattsburg v. Bowman, et ah, just decided, and reported at page 654 of this volume, so that instead of assessing said personal property to the partnerships that own it, and at the place of business of the partnership, the property shall be assessed against the members of the firm, each for his proportionate interest, at the place where the members severally reside.

What was said in the case just decided, is decisive of this case. The circuit court denied the peremptory writ, and its judgment is right and it is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARSHALL, J.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the defendant, as assessor of taxes for Clinton county, to correct the assessments involved in the case of School District of Plattsburg v. Bowman, et ah, just decided, and reported at page 654 of this volume, so that instead of assessing said personal property to the partnerships that own it, and at the place of business of the partnership, the property shall be assessed against the members of the firm, each for his proportionate interest, at the place where the members severally reside.

What was said in the case just decided, is decisive of this case. The circuit court denied the peremptory writ, and its judgment is right and it is affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.W. 1135, 178 Mo. 663, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-school-district-of-plattsburg-v-bowman-mo-1903.