State ex rel. Schneider v. State

592 So. 2d 513, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 212, 1992 WL 11225
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 7, 1992
DocketNo. KW 91 2149
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 592 So. 2d 513 (State ex rel. Schneider v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Schneider v. State, 592 So. 2d 513, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 212, 1992 WL 11225 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

WRIT DENIED: This Court previously has determined that Cage v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990), is not retroactive; it is applicable only to cases pending upon direct review at the time it was decided. Moreover, in light of the strong evidence of identification presented by the victim, any error was clearly harmless. See State v. Cage, 580 So.2d 662 (La.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 211, 116 L.Ed.2d 170 (1991). We find no merit in relator’s claim that his counsel was ineffective.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schneider v. Day
73 F.3d 610 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 So. 2d 513, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 212, 1992 WL 11225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schneider-v-state-lactapp-1992.