State ex rel. Schneider v. State

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State ex rel. Schneider v. State

592 So. 2d 513, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 212, 1992 WL 11225

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 7, 1992·No. No. KW 91 2149·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WRIT DENIED: This Court previously has determined that Cage v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990), is not retroactive; it is applicable only to cases pending upon direct review at the time it was decided. Moreover, in light of the strong evidence of identification presented by the victim, any error was clearly harmless. See State v. Cage, 580 So.2d 662 (La.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 211, 116 L.Ed.2d 170 (1991). We find no merit in relator’s claim that his counsel was ineffective.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WRIT DENIED: This Court previously has determined that Cage v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990), is not retroactive; it is applicable only to cases pending upon direct review at the time it was decided. Moreover, in light of the strong evidence of identification presented by the victim, any error was clearly harmless. See State v. Cage, 580 So.2d 662 (La.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 211, 116 L.Ed.2d 170 (1991). We find no merit in relator’s claim that his counsel was ineffective.

State ex rel. Schneider v. State, 592 So. 2d 513, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 212, 1992 WL 11225 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

592 So. 2d 513 (State ex rel. Schneider v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related