State ex rel. Schminke v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Schminke v. Ellis

24 So. 25, 50 La. Ann. 345, 1898 La. LEXIS 453

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 30, 1898

DocketNo. 12,848

StatusPublished

This text of 24 So. 25 (State ex rel. Schminke v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Schminke v. Ellis, 24 So. 25, 50 La. Ann. 345, 1898 La. LEXIS 453 (La. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

[346]*346The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.

Relator applies for the writs of certiorari and prohibition to restrain proceedings he claims to be in violation of his suspensive appeal, refusing a respite to respondent’s firm, and appointing one of the firm liquidator.

In view of the fact that the litigation in which the suspensive appeal was taken has been ended by the judgments in the suits of iSchminke & Newman vs. Their Creditors, and Edgar Newman vs. 'George F. Schminke, decided to-day, it would serve no purpose to issue the writs even if the relator had any claim to the relief sought.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that our former order on this application be set aside, and it is now ordered that relator’s application be denied at his costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[346]*346The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.

Relator applies for the writs of certiorari and prohibition to restrain proceedings he claims to be in violation of his suspensive appeal, refusing a respite to respondent’s firm, and appointing one of the firm liquidator.

In view of the fact that the litigation in which the suspensive appeal was taken has been ended by the judgments in the suits of iSchminke & Newman vs. Their Creditors, and Edgar Newman vs. 'George F. Schminke, decided to-day, it would serve no purpose to issue the writs even if the relator had any claim to the relief sought.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that our former order on this application be set aside, and it is now ordered that relator’s application be denied at his costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 So. 25, 50 La. Ann. 345, 1898 La. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schminke-v-ellis-la-1898.