State ex rel. Schlemme v. Wright

Nebraska Supreme Court

State ex rel. Schlemme v. Wright

157 N.W. 920, 99 Neb. 790, 1916 Neb. LEXIS 95

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedApril 29, 1916

DocketNo. 18792

StatusPublished

This text of 157 N.W. 920 (State ex rel. Schlemme v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Schlemme v. Wright, 157 N.W. 920, 99 Neb. 790, 1916 Neb. LEXIS 95 (Neb. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Fawcett, J.

Defendant was complained against before a justice of the peace in Douglas county, on a charge of bastardy, and was boiind over to the district court for that county. Trial was had to the court and a jury. The jury found the defendant guilty, and judgment was entered by the court charging defendant with the maintenance of plaintiff’s child, in the sum of $1,500, to be paid to the plaintiff in instalments, which need not be set out. Defendant appeals.

The bill of exceptions found in the record has never been settled by the district judge.- It is not in any manner certified by the clerk of the district court, nor does it appear to have ever been filed in his office. Nor does any attempt seem to have been made by defendant to prepare his brief in accordance with the rules of this court. We have examined the complaint upon which the action is based, and find it sufficient.

Affirmed.

Sedgwioi-c, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fawcett, J.

Defendant was complained against before a justice of the peace in Douglas county, on a charge of bastardy, and was boiind over to the district court for that county. Trial was had to the court and a jury. The jury found the defendant guilty, and judgment was entered by the court charging defendant with the maintenance of plaintiff’s child, in the sum of $1,500, to be paid to the plaintiff in instalments, which need not be set out. Defendant appeals.

The bill of exceptions found in the record has never been settled by the district judge.- It is not in any manner certified by the clerk of the district court, nor does it appear to have ever been filed in his office. Nor does any attempt seem to have been made by defendant to prepare his brief in accordance with the rules of this court. We have examined the complaint upon which the action is based, and find it sufficient.

Affirmed.

Sedgwioi-c, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 N.W. 920, 99 Neb. 790, 1916 Neb. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schlemme-v-wright-neb-1916.