State ex rel. Schindel v. Rowe
This text of 266 N.E.2d 569 (State ex rel. Schindel v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relator contends that his application for a permit was denied by respondent for the reason that the Kettering ordinance, supra, zoned his property “residential” without notice and that by virtue of such legislative action he was prohibited from taking an effective administrative appeal.
Relator made no application for a variance before filing this action. Because he did not exhaust the administrative remedies available to him, mandamus is not available.
R. C. 519.18 provides that upon annexation of township territory to an existing municipal corporation, the zoning regulations then in effect remain in full force until the legislative authority of the city adopts either the existing zoning regulations or new regulations. At no time, either before or after annexation, was the classification of relator’s land modified from “R-l.”
Further, relator has failed to show that the chief building inspector is under a clear legal duty to issue the building permit.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals, denying the writ of mandamus, is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 N.E.2d 569, 25 Ohio St. 2d 47, 54 Ohio Op. 2d 173, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schindel-v-rowe-ohio-1971.