State Ex Rel. Scherer v. Moriarty
This text of 295 N.W. 518 (State Ex Rel. Scherer v. Moriarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When the promise of two members of the court was given that an oral hearing would be granted respondent upon the alternative writ, neither the return nor petitioner’s traverse thereof had been examined. It is now apparent that petitioner’s fear that his cases would be continued over the term was unfounded. All parties interested in this matter will, upon sober reflection, reach the conclusion that a discussion of the situation in open court will not be conducive to a better understanding. More patience, consideration, and forbearance one with the other will bring the best results. It seems unnecessary to repeat what was said in State ex rel. Fickling v. Moriarty, 208 Minn. 469, 294 N. W. 473.
The alternative writ is discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 N.W. 518, 209 Minn. 604, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-scherer-v-moriarty-minn-1941.