State ex rel. Schenck v. Hutcheson

673 N.E.2d 134, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2089
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 18, 1996
Docket96-2082
StatusPublished

This text of 673 N.E.2d 134 (State ex rel. Schenck v. Hutcheson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Schenck v. Hutcheson, 673 N.E.2d 134, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2089 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 N.E.2d 134, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schenck-v-hutcheson-ohio-1996.