State ex rel. Schafer v. Citizens National Bank

168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 25, 1959
DocketNo. 35828
StatusPublished

This text of 168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535 (State ex rel. Schafer v. Citizens National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Schafer v. Citizens National Bank, 168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535 (Ohio 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mandamus is not available where there is a plain and adequate remedy, either legal or equitable, in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Stanley, v. Cook, Supt. of Banks, 146 Ohio St., 348, 66 N. E. (2d), 207; State, ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St., 302, 123 N. E. (2d), 23.

The relief sought by relator is an act which may be compelled by injunction, the proper form of remedy to enforce the right of a shareholder in a private corporation to inspect its books and records. Cincinnati Volksblatt Co. v. Hoffmeister, 62 Ohio St., 189, 56 N. E., 1033, 78 Am. St., Rep., 707, 48 L. R. A., 732.

The demurrer to the amended petition is sustained and a writ of mandamus is denied.

Demurrer sustained and writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Taft, Matthias, Bell and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Stanley v. Cook
66 N.E.2d 207 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schafer-v-citizens-national-bank-ohio-1959.