State Ex Rel. Sawyer v. Neffner

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Sawyer v. Neffner

29 N.E.2d 215, 137 Ohio St. 309, 137 Ohio St. (N.S.) 309, 18 Ohio Op. 287, 1940 Ohio LEXIS 463

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 20, 1940

Docket28357

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 N.E.2d 215 (State Ex Rel. Sawyer v. Neffner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Sawyer v. Neffner, 29 N.E.2d 215, 137 Ohio St. 309, 137 Ohio St. (N.S.) 309, 18 Ohio Op. 287, 1940 Ohio LEXIS 463 (Ohio 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

By the amendment to Section 4785-99, General Code, separation of the state and national party column ballots is required. It contains no provision whatever relating to the form of the ballots as separated. The act amending Section 4785-99, General Code, did not directly or by implication repeal the express provision of Section 4785-105, General Code, which requires a circle at the head of party column ballots’.

The presidential ballot is a party column ballot and therefore comes within the provisions of Section 4785-105, General Code.

The demurrer to the petition is overruled and, respondent not desiring to plead further, a writ of mandamus is allowed. ™ ., ,

77 , Writ allowed.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI