State ex rel. Sattley v. Wofford

29 S.W. 152, 126 Mo. 435, 1895 Mo. LEXIS 185
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJanuary 21, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 29 S.W. 152 (State ex rel. Sattley v. Wofford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Sattley v. Wofford, 29 S.W. 152, 126 Mo. 435, 1895 Mo. LEXIS 185 (Mo. 1895).

Opinion

Gantt, P. J.

The purpose of this proceeding is to obtain a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the respondent who is the duly elected, qualified and acting judge of the criminal court of Jackson county, to compel Jacob Young to make out and furnish relator a full and complete transcript of the evidence and all objections and exceptions heard and taken in a certain criminal prosecution in the criminal court of Jackson county, in which relator was tried and convicted of embezzlement and sentenced to the penitentiary of this state for four years, without cost to relator. This pro-

[436]*436ceeding was evidently brought upon the assumption that Jacob Young was the official stenographer of said criminal court at Independence.

Pending the time the issues herein were being pérfected, the case of the State ex rel. Young v. Murphy et al., Judges of the County Court of Jackson County, was-submitted, and the conclusion reached that there was no statute authorizing the appointment of an official stenographer for said court at Independence and hence no law requiring said Young . to make relator a transcript, without cost to relator. 125 Mo. 464. The learned judge refused to compel Mr. Young to make the transcript, until relator should secure him for his-services in so doing, and in this he was clearly right. The peremptory writ is denied.

All of this division concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Young v. Murphy
28 S.W. 767 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.W. 152, 126 Mo. 435, 1895 Mo. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sattley-v-wofford-mo-1895.