State ex rel. Sassano v. Fuerst

943 N.E.2d 570, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1422
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 2011
Docket2010-2238
StatusPublished

This text of 943 N.E.2d 570 (State ex rel. Sassano v. Fuerst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Sassano v. Fuerst, 943 N.E.2d 570, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1422 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion for judgment on the pleadings. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
943 N.E.2d 570, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sassano-v-fuerst-ohio-2011.