State ex rel. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Cty. Commrs. v. Culbert

825 N.E.2d 625, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1502
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 14, 2005·No. 2005-0424·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Cty. Commrs. v. Culbert, 825 N.E.2d 625, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1502 (Ohio 2005).

825 N.E.2d 625 (State ex rel. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Cty. Commrs. v. Culbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.