State ex rel. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Culbert

823 N.E.2d 877, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1458
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 2005
Docket2005-0424
StatusPublished

This text of 823 N.E.2d 877 (State ex rel. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Culbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Culbert, 823 N.E.2d 877, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1458 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in the manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file its brief within 10 days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file his brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 5 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 N.E.2d 877, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sandusky-cty-bd-of-commrs-v-culbert-ohio-2005.