State ex rel Sanders v. O'Brien
This text of 2023 Ohio 3614 (State ex rel Sanders v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel Sanders v. O'Brien, 2023-Ohio-3614.]
STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )
JC SANDERS
Relator C.A. No. 30876 v.
THE HONORABLE JUDGE TAMMY O[‘]BRIEN, JUDGE, SUMMIT COUNTY ORIGINAL ACTION IN COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL. HABEAS CORPUS
Respondents
Dated: October 4, 2023
PER CURIAM.
{¶1} Petitioner, JC Sanders, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus
seeking an order directing Respondents, Judge Tammy O’Brien, all of the judges of the
Summit County Common Pleas, and the Summit County Prosecutor’s Office, to release
him from custody and pay him money damages. Because Mr. Sanders’ petition does not
comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this Court must dismiss this
action.
{¶2} R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a civil
action against a government employee or entity. All of the named respondents are government
employees and Mr. Sanders, incarcerated in the Summit County Jail, is an inmate. R.C.
2969.21(C) and (D). A case must be dismissed if the inmate fails to comply with the mandatory
requirements of R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. C.A. No. 30876 Page 2 of 3
Findlay Mun. Court, 106 Ohio St.3d 63, 2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C.
2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to
dismissal.”). Mr. Sanders failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C).
{¶3} An inmate seeking waiver of filing fees, as Mr. Sanders is here, must file an
affidavit of indigency. The affidavit must include, among other things, “[a] statement that sets
forth the balance in the inmate account of the inmate for each of the preceding six months, as
certified by the institutional cashier[.]” R.C. 2969.25(C)(1). The Ohio Supreme Court has
construed these words strictly: an affidavit that “does not include a statement setting forth the
balance in [an] inmate account for each of the preceding six months” fails to comply with R.C.
2969.25(C)(1). (emphasis sic.) State ex rel. Roden v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 159 Ohio
St.3d 314, 2020-Ohio-408, ¶ 6.
{¶4} Mr. Sanders filed two additional documents with his petition. He filed a Motion
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in which he asked for a waiver of the prepayment of the filing fees.
The motion states that he has also filed a separate Affidavit of Indigency. The other document
he filed with his petition is a Financial Disclosure Form. It includes Mr. Sanders’ name, home
address, and all of the assets and expenses are complete with “0” for the amount. The form is
signed by Mr. Sanders, but it is not notarized.
{¶5} Mr. Sanders did not file a statement of his prisoner trust account, as required by
R.C. 2969.25(C)(1). He also did not file a notarized affidavit of indigency. “‘R.C. 2969.25(C)
does not permit substantial compliance[;]’” it requires strict adherence by the filing inmate. Id.
at ¶ 8, citing State ex rel. Neil v. French, 153 Ohio St.3d 271, 2018-Ohio-2692, ¶ 7. Therefore,
Mr. Sanders’ Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis does not comply with the mandatory
requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C)(1). C.A. No. 30876 Page 3 of 3
{¶6} Finally, it appears that Mr. Sanders also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A)
because he did not file an affidavit of his prior civil actions. This Court has determined that Mr.
Sanders did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C), which requires
this case to be dismissed, so we need not consider whether he also failed to comply with R.C.
2969.25(A).
{¶7} Because Mr. Sanders did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C.
2969.25, this case is dismissed. Costs are taxed to Mr. Sanders. The clerk of courts is hereby
directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon
the journal. Civ.R. 58.
JENNIFER L. HENSAL FOR THE COURT
STEVENSON, J. FLAGG LANZINGER, J. CONCUR.
APPEARANCES:
JC SANDERS, Relator.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 Ohio 3614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sanders-v-obrien-ohioctapp-2023.