State ex rel. Sanchez v. Russo
This text of 2014 Ohio 4392 (State ex rel. Sanchez v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Sanchez v. Russo, 2014-Ohio-4392.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101741
STATE EX REL. JOSE SANCHEZ RELATOR vs.
JUDGE JOHN J. RUSSO RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 477842 Order No. 477912
RELEASE DATE: September 26, 2014 FOR RELATOR
Jose Sanchez, pro se #564-972, Grafton Correctional Institution 2500 South Avon-Belden Road Grafton, Ohio 44044
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
BY: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center, 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 LARRY A. JONES, SR., P.J.:
{¶1} Jose Sanchez has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Sanchez seeks
an order from this court that requires Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold to render a ruling
with regard to a “motion to vacate for being twice in jeopardy” filed in State v. Sanchez,
Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-08-515338.1 In addition, Sanchez seeks a hearing with regard to
the motion to vacate. We decline to issue a writ of mandamus on behalf of Sanchez.
{¶2} Sanchez’s request for a writ of mandamus is moot. Attached to Judge
Saffold’s motion for summary judgment is a copy of a journal entry, journalized on
August 13, 2014, that demonstrates a ruling has been rendered with regard to the motion
to vacate. In addition, Sanchez has failed to demonstrate that Judge Saffold is required
to conduct a hearing with regard to the motion to vacate. Thus, Sanchez is not entitled to
a writ of mandamus. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas,
74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6
Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).
{¶3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Saffold’s motion for summary judgment. Costs
to Judge Saffold. Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties
with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R.
58(B).
{¶4} Writ denied.
Sanchez incorrectly named Judge John J. Russo as the respondent. 1 Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold is the judge assigned to preside over Case No. CR-08-515338. LARRY A. JONES, SR., PRESIDING JUDGE
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J., and EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 4392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sanchez-v-russo-ohioctapp-2014.