State ex rel. Salisberry v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Salisberry v. Henderson

253 So. 2d 62, 259 La. 796, 1971 La. LEXIS 3976

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 13, 1971

DocketNo. 51796

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 So. 2d 62 (State ex rel. Salisberry v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Salisberry v. Henderson, 253 So. 2d 62, 259 La. 796, 1971 La. LEXIS 3976 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Joseph Salisberry, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Although the’ petitioner’s retained counsel may have neglected to perfect an appeal, this does not amount to State action depriving him of the effective assistance of counsel and thus presents no valid claim of unconstitutional denial of right. Cf., Beto v. Martin, 396 F.2d 432 (5 Cir. 1968).

SANDERS, J., concurs in the denial of the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Joseph Salisberry, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Although the’ petitioner’s retained counsel may have neglected to perfect an appeal, this does not amount to State action depriving him of the effective assistance of counsel and thus presents no valid claim of unconstitutional denial of right. Cf., Beto v. Martin, 396 F.2d 432 (5 Cir. 1968).

SANDERS, J., concurs in the denial of the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 So. 2d 62, 259 La. 796, 1971 La. LEXIS 3976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-salisberry-v-henderson-la-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack