State ex rel. Sadler v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Sadler v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 31, 1962

DocketNo. 37101

StatusPublished

This text of 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80 (State ex rel. Sadler v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Sadler v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp., 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80 (Ohio 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since it appears from the record that the cause was heard by the Court of Appeals on the pleadings and evidence, and that there is no bill of exceptions before this court exemplifying the facts necessary in determining the issues presented, the appeal is dismissed. State, ex rel. Novak, v. Bright, 165 Ohio St., 363; In re Williams, 165 Ohio St., 511; In re Sublett, 169 Ohio St., 19.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Since it appears from the record that the cause was heard by the Court of Appeals on the pleadings and evidence, and that there is no bill of exceptions before this court exemplifying the facts necessary in determining the issues presented, the appeal is dismissed. State, ex rel. Novak, v. Bright, 165 Ohio St., 363; In re Williams, 165 Ohio St., 511; In re Sublett, 169 Ohio St., 19.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sadler-v-baldwin-lima-hamilton-corp-ohio-1962.