State ex rel. Sadler v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Sadler v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 1962·No. No. 37101·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since it appears from the record that the cause was heard by the Court of Appeals on the pleadings and evidence, and that there is no bill of exceptions before this court exemplifying the facts necessary in determining the issues presented, the appeal is dismissed. State, ex rel. Novak, v. Bright, 165 Ohio St., 363; In re Williams, 165 Ohio St., 511; In re Sublett, 169 Ohio St., 19.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Since it appears from the record that the cause was heard by the Court of Appeals on the pleadings and evidence, and that there is no bill of exceptions before this court exemplifying the facts necessary in determining the issues presented, the appeal is dismissed. State, ex rel. Novak, v. Bright, 165 Ohio St., 363; In re Williams, 165 Ohio St., 511; In re Sublett, 169 Ohio St., 19.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

State ex rel. Sadler v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp., 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80 (Ohio 1962).

Pincite

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80 (State ex rel. Sadler v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.