State ex rel. Ryan v. Malone

Missouri Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Ryan v. Malone

151 S.W. 197, 167 Mo. App. 701, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 705

DecidedNovember 12, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 151 S.W. 197 (State ex rel. Ryan v. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Ryan v. Malone, 151 S.W. 197, 167 Mo. App. 701, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 705 (Mo. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTONI, J.

This is a suit on a taxbill. The finding and judgment were for plaintiff and defendant prosecutes the appeal. The taxbill involved was issued under the drainage statutes in part compensation for work and labor performed in constructing a system of drainage in Knox county under á contract with a drainage district organized under the statutes.

The questions presented are identical with those involved in State ex rel. v. Daniel Ryan, collector, etc., v. ~W. Coles et al., decided today, and the disposition of this case depends in all respects upon that one.. The whole matter is fully discussed in the opinion in the case above referred to, and for the reasons there given, this judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Beynolds, P. J., and Caulfield, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTONI, J.

This is a suit on a taxbill. The finding and judgment were for plaintiff and defendant prosecutes the appeal. The taxbill involved was issued under the drainage statutes in part compensation for work and labor performed in constructing a system of drainage in Knox county under á contract with a drainage district organized under the statutes.

The questions presented are identical with those involved in State ex rel. v. Daniel Ryan, collector, etc., v. ~W. Coles et al., decided today, and the disposition of this case depends in all respects upon that one.. The whole matter is fully discussed in the opinion in the case above referred to, and for the reasons there given, this judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Beynolds, P. J., and Caulfield, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 S.W. 197, 167 Mo. App. 701, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ryan-v-malone-moctapp-1912.