State ex rel. Ryan v. Gray

Missouri Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Ryan v. Gray

151 S.W. 198, 167 Mo. App. 702, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 706

DecidedNovember 12, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 151 S.W. 198 (State ex rel. Ryan v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Ryan v. Gray, 151 S.W. 198, 167 Mo. App. 702, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 706 (Mo. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTONI, J.

Tbis is a suit on a taxbill. Tbe finding and judgment were for plaintiff and defendant prosecutes tbe appeal. Tbe taxbill involved was issued under tbe drainage statutes in part compensation for wort and labor performed in constructing a system of drainage in Knox county under a contract with a drainage district organized under tbe statutes.

Tbe questions presented are identical with those involved in State ex rel. Daniel Ryan, Collector, etc., v. W. Coles et al., decided to-day, and tbe disposition of tbis case depends in all respects upon that one. Tbe whole.matter is fully discussed in tbe opinion in tbe case above referred to, and for tbe reasons there given, tbis judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Reynolds, P. J., and Caulfield, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTONI, J.

Tbis is a suit on a taxbill. Tbe finding and judgment were for plaintiff and defendant prosecutes tbe appeal. Tbe taxbill involved was issued under tbe drainage statutes in part compensation for wort and labor performed in constructing a system of drainage in Knox county under a contract with a drainage district organized under tbe statutes.

Tbe questions presented are identical with those involved in State ex rel. Daniel Ryan, Collector, etc., v. W. Coles et al., decided to-day, and tbe disposition of tbis case depends in all respects upon that one. Tbe whole.matter is fully discussed in tbe opinion in tbe case above referred to, and for tbe reasons there given, tbis judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Reynolds, P. J., and Caulfield, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 S.W. 198, 167 Mo. App. 702, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ryan-v-gray-moctapp-1912.