State ex rel. Ryan v. Gray

151 S.W. 198, 167 Mo. App. 702, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 706
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 12, 1912·Published

Opinion

NORTONI, J.

Tbis is a suit on a taxbill. Tbe finding and judgment were for plaintiff and defendant prosecutes tbe appeal. Tbe taxbill involved was issued under tbe drainage statutes in part compensation for wort and labor performed in constructing a system of drainage in Knox county under a contract with a drainage district organized under tbe statutes.

Tbe questions presented are identical with those involved in State ex rel. Daniel Ryan, Collector, etc., v. W. Coles et al., decided to-day, and tbe disposition of tbis case depends in all respects upon that one. Tbe whole.matter is fully discussed in tbe opinion in tbe case above referred to, and for tbe reasons there given, tbis judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Reynolds, P. J., and Caulfield, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Ryan v. Gray, 151 S.W. 198, 167 Mo. App. 702, 1912 Mo. App. LEXIS 706 (Mo. Ct. App. 1912).

151 S.W. 198 (State ex rel. Ryan v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.