State ex rel. Russell v. Williams

150 P. 227, 96 Kan. 82, 1915 Kan. LEXIS 315
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Russell v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Kan. 527
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided July 10, 1915·No. No. 18,691·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In the decision affirming the judgment in this case (The State, ex rel., v. Williams, 92 Kan. 527, 150 Pac. 225) it was held that no error was committed in the admission of certain testimony, which was objected to under the rule excluding evidence of offers of compromise. A rehearing was granted with respect to that question. Upon full consideration of the further argument the original decision is adhered to, for the additional reason that even if the testimony were incom[83]*83petent, the likelihood of its having affected the verdict is só remote that the judgment ought not to be reversed on that account.

Dawson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Russell v. Williams, 150 P. 227, 96 Kan. 82, 1915 Kan. LEXIS 315 (kan 1915).

150 P. 227 (State ex rel. Russell v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Russell v. Williams
150 P. 225 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)