State ex rel. Russell v. Thomas

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Russell v. Thomas

702 N.E.2d 105, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3352

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 23, 1998

Docket98-43

StatusPublished

This text of 702 N.E.2d 105 (State ex rel. Russell v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Russell v. Thomas, 702 N.E.2d 105, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3352 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Pursuant to this court’s March 26, 1998 order establishing a pilot mediation program, a mediation conference was held in this case on April 29, 1998. It has come to the attention of the court that the parties, in the course of mediation, agreed to settle certain issues in the case; however, the parties have not filed any document in the case with respect to the status 'of their negotiations. Whereas the proceedings in this case have been delayed pending conclusion of the mediation,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the parties show cause, within twenty days of the date of this entry, why the court should not proceed to consider this case pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. X(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Pursuant to this court’s March 26, 1998 order establishing a pilot mediation program, a mediation conference was held in this case on April 29, 1998. It has come to the attention of the court that the parties, in the course of mediation, agreed to settle certain issues in the case; however, the parties have not filed any document in the case with respect to the status 'of their negotiations. Whereas the proceedings in this case have been delayed pending conclusion of the mediation,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the parties show cause, within twenty days of the date of this entry, why the court should not proceed to consider this case pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. X(5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 N.E.2d 105, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-russell-v-thomas-ohio-1998.