State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial Commission of Ohio

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial Commission of Ohio

135 Ohio St. (N.S.) 479

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 31, 1939

DocketNo. 27448

StatusPublished

This text of 135 Ohio St. (N.S.) 479 (State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial Commission of Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 135 Ohio St. (N.S.) 479 (Ohio 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Jouenal Entey. This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of the record of the Court of Appeals of Franklin county and was argued by counsel, and it appearing to the court that said cause originated in the Court of Appeals and was referred to a referee who made findings of facts and conclusions of law, which findings and conclusions were approved and confirmed, by said Court of Appeals, and judgment rendered in favor of the appellee; and it further appearing that no bill of exceptions was signed and allowed disclosing the evidence upon which the report of the referee and the judgment of the Court of Appeals wasi based, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be and the same hereby is affirmed for want of an adequate record.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmeeman, Williams, Myees, Matthias and Haet, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jouenal Entey. This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of the record of the Court of Appeals of Franklin county and was argued by counsel, and it appearing to the court that said cause originated in the Court of Appeals and was referred to a referee who made findings of facts and conclusions of law, which findings and conclusions were approved and confirmed, by said Court of Appeals, and judgment rendered in favor of the appellee; and it further appearing that no bill of exceptions was signed and allowed disclosing the evidence upon which the report of the referee and the judgment of the Court of Appeals wasi based, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be and the same hereby is affirmed for want of an adequate record.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmeeman, Williams, Myees, Matthias and Haet, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 Ohio St. (N.S.) 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-russell-v-industrial-commission-of-ohio-ohio-1939.