State ex rel. Rushing v. Whitley
This text of 662 So. 2d 464 (State ex rel. Rushing v. Whitley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Rushing, David; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 109,263; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW-931093.
Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Resentencing alone does not restart the three-year time period for applying for post conviction relief. Cf. State ex rel. Campbell v. Whitley, 93-0677 (La. 10/27/95), 661 So.2d 1367 (out-of-time appeal does restart three-year period).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
662 So. 2d 464, 1995 La. LEXIS 2813, 1995 WL 672773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rushing-v-whitley-la-1995.