Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State ex rel. Rushing v. Whitley

State ex rel. Rushing v. Whitley

662 So. 2d 464, 1995 La. LEXIS 2813, 1995 WL 672773
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 13, 1995·No. No. 93-KH-2722·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In re Rushing, David; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 109,263; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW-931093.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Resentencing alone does not restart the three-year time period for applying for post conviction relief. Cf. State ex rel. Campbell v. Whitley, 93-0677 (La. 10/27/95), 661 So.2d 1367 (out-of-time appeal does restart three-year period).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Rushing v. Whitley, 662 So. 2d 464, 1995 La. LEXIS 2813, 1995 WL 672773 (La. 1995).

662 So. 2d 464 (State ex rel. Rushing v. Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Nixon
254 So. 3d 1228 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
State v. Hall
250 So. 3d 911 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Carter, Jr.
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017
State v. Mead
165 So. 3d 1044 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
State v. Brumfield
152 So. 3d 870 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2014)
State v. Littleton
982 So. 2d 978 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
State ex rel. Frazier v. State
868 So. 2d 9 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2004)