State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common Pleas
346 N.E.2d 325, 46 Ohio St. 2d 58, 75 Ohio Op. 2d 142, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 594
Opinion
Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal, and “prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.” State, ex rel. Gilla, v. Fellerhoff (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 86, 88.
[59] The judgment'of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint in prohibition, is affirmed: '■ '
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common Pleas, 346 N.E.2d 325, 46 Ohio St. 2d 58, 75 Ohio Op. 2d 142, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 594 (Ohio 1976).
346 N.E.2d 325 (State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. American National Red Cross v. Pokorny
607 N.E.2d 524 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1992)
State ex rel. Tilford v. Crush
529 N.E.2d 1245 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
State ex rel. Yates v. Court of Appeals
512 N.E.2d 343 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1987)
Manrow v. Court of Common Pleas
485 N.E.2d 713 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1985)