State ex rel. Rucci v. Curran

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Rucci v. Curran

947 N.E.2d 176, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1493

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 16, 2011

Docket2011-0761

StatusPublished

This text of 947 N.E.2d 176 (State ex rel. Rucci v. Curran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Rucci v. Curran, 947 N.E.2d 176, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1493 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss and relators’ emergency motion for stay of the trial court proceedings, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted and the emergency motion for stay is denied. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss and relators’ emergency motion for stay of the trial court proceedings, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted and the emergency motion for stay is denied. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

947 N.E.2d 176, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rucci-v-curran-ohio-2011.