State ex rel. Rucci v. Curran

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Rucci v. Curran

947 N.E.2d 176, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1493

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 16, 2011·No. 2011-0761·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss and relators’ emergency motion for stay of the trial court proceedings, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted and the emergency motion for stay is denied. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss and relators’ emergency motion for stay of the trial court proceedings, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted and the emergency motion for stay is denied. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Rucci v. Curran, 947 N.E.2d 176, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1493 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

947 N.E.2d 176 (State ex rel. Rucci v. Curran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.