State ex rel. Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 46.]
THE STATE EX REL. RUBBERMAID, INC., APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; LOWRY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-227.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-183—Submitted August 25, 1999—Decided October 13, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD12-1618. __________________ Critchfield, Critchfield & Johnston, Ltd., and Susan E. Baker, for appellee. James C. Ayers Law Office and James C. Ayers, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1999 Ohio 227 (State ex rel. Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.