State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.

1999 Ohio 176, 86 Ohio St. 3d 384

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 8, 1999

Docket1998-2305

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 176 (State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm., 1999 Ohio 176, 86 Ohio St. 3d 384 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 384.]

THE STATE EX REL. ROY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-176.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2305—Submitted June 22, 1999—Decided September 8, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD06-741. __________________ William D. Snyder & Associates and John Lesko, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., and Cynthia C. Felson, for appellee Henry J. Kaiser Company. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 384.]

THE STATE EX REL. ROY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-176.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2305—Submitted June 22, 1999—Decided September 8, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD06-741. __________________ William D. Snyder & Associates and John Lesko, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., and Cynthia C. Felson, for appellee Henry J. Kaiser Company. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 176, 86 Ohio St. 3d 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-roy-v-indus-comm-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack