State ex rel. Rowe v. Martin
This text of 44 Fla. 175 (State ex rel. Rowe v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was referred by the court to its commissioners who report that the writ of error ought to be dismissed.
The writ of error is sued out from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Madison county, rendered on September 10th, 1897, in a proceeding by mandamus to require the defendant in error, as County Judge of Madison county, to issue to the relators a license to carry on, conduct and manage a mercantile business in said county and State.
An alternative writ issued and defendant in error filed his answer, to which a demurer was interposed. The court [176]*176overruled the demurer, denied the application for peremptory writ ánd adjudged that defendant in error go without day.
The time during which such license would have remained operative, if issued, has long since expired. It would, therefore, be fruitless to pass on the merits of the case on this writ of error, and it will, therefore, be dismissed. Broward v. Duval Athletic Club, 39 Fla. 751, 23 South. Rep. 489; State ex rel. Vereen v. Commissioners of Marion County, 27 Fla. 438, 8 South. Rep. 849.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Fla. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rowe-v-martin-fla-1902.