State Ex Rel. Rowe v. Lee

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Rowe v. Lee

183 So. 475, 133 Fla. 825

DecidedSeptember 15, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 475 (State Ex Rel. Rowe v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Rowe v. Lee, 183 So. 475, 133 Fla. 825 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—The above styled cause is at issue before ■the Court upon motion of Counsel for Respondent to quash the Alternative AYrit of Mandamus issued in the cause. Mr. Chief Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the said motion to quash the alternative writ should be denied; while Mr. Justice AYhitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Chapman are of the opinion that said motion to quash the alternative writ should be granted. The Court being thus evenly divided, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that *826 the motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus in this cause, be and it is hereby denied.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

—The above styled cause is at issue before ■the Court upon motion of Counsel for Respondent to quash the Alternative AYrit of Mandamus issued in the cause. Mr. Chief Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the said motion to quash the alternative writ should be denied; while Mr. Justice AYhitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Chapman are of the opinion that said motion to quash the alternative writ should be granted. The Court being thus evenly divided, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that *826 the motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus in this cause, be and it is hereby denied.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 So. 475, 133 Fla. 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rowe-v-lee-fla-1938.