State ex rel. Rousell v. State
This text of 577 So. 2d 55 (State ex rel. Rousell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Rousell, Byrant K.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, Nos. 53004, 53005; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW90-0493.
Denied. Relator is not entitled to the relief he seeks. A petition to the U.S. District Court which imposed his 25 year federal sentence, seeking a recommendation of concurrent sentences, may obtain for relator the relief he seeks. If relator does not choose to seek relief in the federal courts, or if his efforts are unavailing, he may file for post conviction relief in the state courts, asserting constitutional infirmity in his guilty plea on the basis of his claim that the promise of a concurrent sentence was a “plea-inducing agreement”.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
577 So. 2d 55, 1991 La. LEXIS 963, 1991 WL 54083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rousell-v-state-la-1991.