State ex rel. Rounsavall v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Rounsavall v. State

604 So. 2d 1296, 1992 La. LEXIS 2945, 1992 WL 265986

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 28, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-2580·Published

Opinion

In re Rounsavall, Steven M.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 246-562(D).

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about August 14, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rounsavall, Steven M.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 246-562(D).

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about August 14, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State ex rel. Rounsavall v. State, 604 So. 2d 1296, 1992 La. LEXIS 2945, 1992 WL 265986 (La. 1992).

Pincite

604 So. 2d 1296 (State ex rel. Rounsavall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.