State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm.

2002 Ohio 5784, 97 Ohio St. 3d 196

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 6, 2002

Docket2002-0413

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2002 Ohio 5784 (State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm., 2002 Ohio 5784, 97 Ohio St. 3d 196 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 196.]

THE STATE EX REL. ROUBAL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm., 2002-Ohio-5784.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0413—Submitted September 17, 2002—Decided November 6, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-595. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 196.]

THE STATE EX REL. ROUBAL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm., 2002-Ohio-5784.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0413—Submitted September 17, 2002—Decided November 6, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-595. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Ohio 5784, 97 Ohio St. 3d 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-roubal-v-indus-comm-ohio-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack