State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm.

2002 Ohio 5784, 97 Ohio St. 3d 196
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 2002·No. 2002-0413·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 196.]

THE STATE EX REL. ROUBAL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm., 2002-Ohio-5784.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0413—Submitted September 17, 2002—Decided November 6, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-595. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm., 2002 Ohio 5784, 97 Ohio St. 3d 196 (Ohio 2002).

2002 Ohio 5784 (State ex rel. Roubal v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Industrial Commission, Unpublished Decision (2-10-2004)
2004 Ohio 587 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)