State ex rel. Rothenbucher v. Hawes

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Rothenbucher v. Hawes

76 S.W. 1108, 177 Mo. 408, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 208

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided November 3, 1903·Published

Opinion

GANTT, J.

Mandamus for $1,062.86, for salary of relator and one other. Judgment for defendants and relator appealed.

Both claimants had fully served their appointed terms and were mere holdovers when they were dropped. The case is therefore within the - rule laid down in State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, reported at page 360 of this volume. The judgment of the circuit court is for the right party, and it is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GANTT, J.

Mandamus for $1,062.86, for salary of relator and one other. Judgment for defendants and relator appealed.

Both claimants had fully served their appointed terms and were mere holdovers when they were dropped. The case is therefore within the - rule laid down in State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, reported at page 360 of this volume. The judgment of the circuit court is for the right party, and it is affirmed.

All concur.

State ex rel. Rothenbucher v. Hawes, 76 S.W. 1108, 177 Mo. 408, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 208 (Mo. 1903).

Pincite

76 S.W. 1108 (State ex rel. Rothenbucher v. Hawes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.