State ex rel. Roth v. Ryan
This text of 137 N.W.2d 833 (State ex rel. Roth v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent (plaintiff below) filed no brief in this court. Therefore, the appeal is not decided on the merits, but the judgment is reversed pursuant to sec. (Rule) 251.57, Stats., which provides:
“When a cause is submitted, or presented by counsel for appellant or plaintiff in error, but not by the opposing party, the judgment or order appealed from may be reversed as of course, without argument.”
For other decisions which have reversed as of course under this rule, see Cihlar v. Harvey (1965), 27 Wis. (2d) 269, 133 N. W. (2d) 815; State v. Seymour (1964), 24 Wis. (2d) 258, 262, 128 N. W. (2d) 680; Fuller v. Fiedler (1963), 19 Wis. (2d) 422, 426, 120 N. W. (2d) 700; Estate of Ohnstad (1962), 15 Wis. (2d) 361, 112 N. W. [706]*706(2d) 917; State ex rel. Gresholdt v. Board of Appeals (1961), 12 Wis. (2d) 516, 107 N. W. (2d) 484.
By the Court. — Judgment reversed, with directions to dismiss the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 N.W.2d 833, 28 Wis. 2d 695, 1965 Wisc. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-roth-v-ryan-wis-1965.