State Ex Rel. Roshon v. Auble
This text of 200 N.E. 507 (State Ex Rel. Roshon v. Auble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard upon the motion of the relator for judgment on the pleadings, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the petition be dismissed at the costs of the respondents, it appearing from the pleadings and statement of counsel that the relator is entitled to the office, has been appointed to the office since this proceeding was instituted, is now in office, and the respondents are not contesting his incumbency.
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 N.E. 507, 130 Ohio St. 485, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485, 5 Ohio Op. 102, 1936 Ohio LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-roshon-v-auble-ohio-1936.