State ex rel. Rosewater v. Holcomb

77 N.W. 1117, 56 Neb. 583, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 327
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 17, 1898
DocketNo. 10007
StatusPublished

This text of 77 N.W. 1117 (State ex rel. Rosewater v. Holcomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Rosewater v. Holcomb, 77 N.W. 1117, 56 Neb. 583, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 327 (Neb. 1898).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was to compel the respondent to perform certain duties claimed to devolve upon him by virtue of his office. In State v. Moores, 55 Neb. 480, it was held that the act of the legislature of 1897 (Session Laws 1897, p. 124, cli. 10, seas. 166-168), in so far as it assumes to confer authority upon the governor to appoint fire and police commissioners in cities of the metro[584]*584politan class,- is void. The duty of wbich it is now sought' to compel the performance depends for its exercise upon the force of the statute above referred to, and,-as the statute is void, no such duty exists, and therefore its per-, formance cannot be controlled by mandamus. The writ is 'therefore

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Moores
41 L.R.A. 624 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 N.W. 1117, 56 Neb. 583, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rosewater-v-holcomb-neb-1898.