State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

736 N.E.2d 903, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2594
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 2000·No. 00-1559·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion for issuance of peremptory writ and on answer of respondent and counterclaim. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 736 N.E.2d 903, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2594 (Ohio 2000).

736 N.E.2d 903 (State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
2001 Ohio 95 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)