State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

736 N.E.2d 903, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2594
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 18, 2000
Docket00-1559
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 736 N.E.2d 903 (State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 736 N.E.2d 903, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2594 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion for issuance of peremptory writ and on answer of respondent and counterclaim. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
2001 Ohio 95 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
736 N.E.2d 903, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rose-v-ohio-dept-of-rehab-corr-ohio-2000.