State ex rel. Rootstown Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Portage Cty. Court of Common Pleas

675 N.E.2d 8, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1554, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3648
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 5, 1997
Docket97-233
StatusPublished

This text of 675 N.E.2d 8 (State ex rel. Rootstown Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Portage Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Rootstown Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Portage Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 675 N.E.2d 8, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1554, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3648 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before February 25, 1997; relators shall file their brief within ten days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file its brief within twenty days after the filing of relators’ brief; and relators may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 N.E.2d 8, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1554, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rootstown-local-school-dist-bd-of-edn-v-portage-cty-ohio-1997.