State ex rel. Ronan v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 1998 Ohio 56 (State ex rel. Ronan v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 386.]
THE STATE EX REL. RONAN, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Ronan v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-56.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-2245—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 14, 1998.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD06-812. __________________ Law Offices of Larry Hotchkiss and Scott A. Bravi; Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellee and cross-appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee Industrial Commission. Gibson & Robbins-Penniman and Corrine S. Carman, for appellant and cross-appellee city of Newark. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1998 Ohio 56, 83 Ohio St. 3d 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ronan-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.