State ex rel. Romes v. Horvath
805 N.E.2d 534, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1481
This text of 805 N.E.2d 534 (State ex rel. Romes v. Horvath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Romes v. Horvath, 805 N.E.2d 534, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1481 (Ohio 2004).
Opinion
In Prohibition and Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of prohibition and mandamus. Upon consideration of relators’ motion to expedite,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
805 N.E.2d 534, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-romes-v-horvath-ohio-2004.