State ex rel. Rodocker v. Schroy

27 Ohio Law. Abs. 164, 1938 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1158
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Rodocker v. Schroy. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ohio Law. Abs. 512
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1938·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Under the constitution of Ohio, an amendment to the charter of a city becomes effective on the day of the election at which it is adopted by the electors, unless the proposition to postpone the taking effect of the amendment is submitted to and adopted by the voters.

This proposition is settled by the Supreme Court of Ohio in t'he case of State ex McNamara v Campbell et, 94 Oh St 403, and is in accordance with the rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States (see Dillon v Gloss. 256 U. S. 368, and Druggan v Druggan, U. S. Marshal et, 269 U. S. 36).

In the case before us, such postponement of the effective date was not submitted to the voters, and therefore could not nave been adopted by them; and accordingly the effective date of the amendment here in question is that provided by the constitution of Ohio, which is the day of the election at which the electors voted to adopt the amendment.

Judgment affirmed.

STEVENS, PJ, WASHBURN, and DOYLE, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Rodocker v. Schroy, 27 Ohio Law. Abs. 164, 1938 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1158 (Ohio Ct. App. 1938).

27 Ohio Law. Abs. 164 (State ex rel. Rodocker v. Schroy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dillon v. Gloss
256 U.S. 368 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Druggan v. Anderson
269 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1925)