State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial Commission

341 N.E.2d 592, 45 Ohio St. 2d 96, 74 Ohio Op. 2d 203, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 540
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1976
DocketNo. 75-171
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 341 N.E.2d 592 (State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial Commission, 341 N.E.2d 592, 45 Ohio St. 2d 96, 74 Ohio Op. 2d 203, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 540 (Ohio 1976).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant contends, in essence, that there is no competent medical evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s order granting claimant permanent and total disability from a previously allowed claim, thus constituting an abuse of discretion subject to correction by an action in mandamus.

This court has consistently stated that “the determination of disputed factual situations is within the final jurisdiction of the commission, subject to correction by action in mandamus only upon a showing of abuse of discretion * * * [but] where the record contains evidence which supports the commission’s factual findings, this court will not disturb that determination. * # *” (Citations omitted.) State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282-283.

Upon a review of the record, this court concurs with the decision of the Court of Appeals below that “thero is sufficient evidence * * * to support a conclusion both that elaimaitt' is permanently and totally disabled and that [98]*98such disability resulted from the industrial injury involved * * * [and] [t]here is sufficient evidence to support the commission’s finding as to the date of commencement of the permanent total disability.”

As did the Court of Appeals, we conclude that the order of the Industrial Commission herein did not constitute an abuse of discretion.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Williams v. Moody's of Dayton, Inc.
438 N.E.2d 1162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1982)
State ex rel. Ianiro v. Industrial Commission
397 N.E.2d 1355 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1979)
State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission
388 N.E.2d 1382 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 N.E.2d 592, 45 Ohio St. 2d 96, 74 Ohio Op. 2d 203, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rockwell-international-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1976.