State ex rel. Robison v. Kence

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Robison v. Kence

679 N.E.2d 2, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1500, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3636

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 19, 1997

Docket97-682

StatusPublished

This text of 679 N.E.2d 2 (State ex rel. Robison v. Kence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Robison v. Kence, 679 N.E.2d 2, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1500, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3636 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On May 14, 1997, relator filed a document titled “Motion to strike respondent’s motion to dismiss petition.” Relator’s motion is, in substance, a response to respondent’s motion to dismiss and, as such, is untimely. Whereas S.CtPract.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits untimely filings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On May 14, 1997, relator filed a document titled “Motion to strike respondent’s motion to dismiss petition.” Relator’s motion is, in substance, a response to respondent’s motion to dismiss and, as such, is untimely. Whereas S.CtPract.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits untimely filings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

679 N.E.2d 2, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1500, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-robison-v-kence-ohio-1997.