State ex rel. Robinson v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

662 N.E.2d 798, 75 Ohio St. 3d 431
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 17, 1996·No. No. 95-2110·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the court of appeals. Since Sturges v. Longworth (1853), 1 Ohio St. 544, we have approved of a court of common pleas’ appointing a guardian ad litem, literally a guardian for the case, who has no duties prior to the institution of a suit or after its termination but whose sole duty is to defend in a particular cause. Civ.R. 17(B) authorizes a court, as incident to its power to try a case, to order the appointment of a guardian ad litem. Robinson’s remedy was appeal from that order. Mandamus will not issue where, as here, there was an adequate remedy at law.

The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

[432]*432Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Robinson v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 662 N.E.2d 798, 75 Ohio St. 3d 431 (Ohio 1996).

662 N.E.2d 798 (State ex rel. Robinson v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion)
2018 Ohio 2417 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)