State ex rel. Robinson v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Robinson v. Brown

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 22, 1952·No. No. 33266·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In prescribing the form of the presidential ballot, the Secretary of State, in following the statutes, performs solely a ministerial duty and is in no way acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity. [247]*247Therefore, the remedy of prohibition is not available.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In prescribing the form of the presidential ballot, the Secretary of State, in following the statutes, performs solely a ministerial duty and is in no way acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity. [247]*247Therefore, the remedy of prohibition is not available.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Robinson v. Brown, 158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246 (Ohio 1952).

Pincite

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246 (State ex rel. Robinson v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.