State ex rel. Robinson v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Robinson v. Brown

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 22, 1952

DocketNo. 33266

StatusPublished

This text of 158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246 (State ex rel. Robinson v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Robinson v. Brown, 158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246 (Ohio 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In prescribing the form of the presidential ballot, the Secretary of State, in following the statutes, performs solely a ministerial duty and is in no way acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity. [247]*247Therefore, the remedy of prohibition is not available.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In prescribing the form of the presidential ballot, the Secretary of State, in following the statutes, performs solely a ministerial duty and is in no way acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity. [247]*247Therefore, the remedy of prohibition is not available.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-robinson-v-brown-ohio-1952.