State ex rel. Robertson v. Twenty-First Judicial District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Robertson v. Twenty-First Judicial District Court

632 So. 2d 756, 1994 La. LEXIS 470, 1994 WL 58708

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 18, 1994·No. No. 94-KH-0333·Published

Opinion

In re Robertson, Luther; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 43987-8-9.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence, motion to reconsider sentence and motion for appeal he has filed on or about September 24, 1993. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Robertson, Luther; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 43987-8-9.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence, motion to reconsider sentence and motion for appeal he has filed on or about September 24, 1993. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

State ex rel. Robertson v. Twenty-First Judicial District Court, 632 So. 2d 756, 1994 La. LEXIS 470, 1994 WL 58708 (La. 1994).

Pincite

632 So. 2d 756 (State ex rel. Robertson v. Twenty-First Judicial District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.