State ex rel. Robertson v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Robertson v. State

596 So. 2d 202, 1992 La. LEXIS 1405, 1992 WL 73963

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 10, 1992·No. No. 91-KH-0863·Published

Opinion

In re Robertson, Wilbert; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 130,808; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 22925-CW.

Denied. Relator may resubmit his petition to this Court if he can establish his claim that his petition to the Second Circuit filed as 22,925-CW was complete by providing a copy of the record in 22,925-CW when he files again. If relator is unable to establish this claim, he should consider filing another petition in the Second Circuit which conforms in every respect to the rules governing the filing of writs set forth in Rule 4 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Robertson, Wilbert; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 130,808; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 22925-CW.

Denied. Relator may resubmit his petition to this Court if he can establish his claim that his petition to the Second Circuit filed as 22,925-CW was complete by providing a copy of the record in 22,925-CW when he files again. If relator is unable to establish this claim, he should consider filing another petition in the Second Circuit which conforms in every respect to the rules governing the filing of writs set forth in Rule 4 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal.

State ex rel. Robertson v. State, 596 So. 2d 202, 1992 La. LEXIS 1405, 1992 WL 73963 (La. 1992).

Pincite

596 So. 2d 202 (State ex rel. Robertson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.