State ex rel. Robertson v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Robertson v. State

596 So. 2d 202, 1992 La. LEXIS 1405, 1992 WL 73963

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 10, 1992

DocketNo. 91-KH-0863

StatusPublished

This text of 596 So. 2d 202 (State ex rel. Robertson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Robertson v. State, 596 So. 2d 202, 1992 La. LEXIS 1405, 1992 WL 73963 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Robertson, Wilbert; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 130,808; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 22925-CW.

Denied. Relator may resubmit his petition to this Court if he can establish his claim that his petition to the Second Circuit filed as 22,925-CW was complete by providing a copy of the record in 22,925-CW when he files again. If relator is unable to establish this claim, he should consider filing another petition in the Second Circuit which conforms in every respect to the rules governing the filing of writs set forth in Rule 4 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Robertson, Wilbert; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 130,808; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 22925-CW.

Denied. Relator may resubmit his petition to this Court if he can establish his claim that his petition to the Second Circuit filed as 22,925-CW was complete by providing a copy of the record in 22,925-CW when he files again. If relator is unable to establish this claim, he should consider filing another petition in the Second Circuit which conforms in every respect to the rules governing the filing of writs set forth in Rule 4 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

596 So. 2d 202, 1992 La. LEXIS 1405, 1992 WL 73963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-robertson-v-state-la-1992.